Demonstrating daily that diversity is not strength!
Did good ol’ demented Joe spill the beans again?
Joe Biden is asked about his disagreements with Kamala Harris on certain issues:
"Like I told Barack, if I reach something where there's a fundamental disagreement we have based on a moral principle, I'll develop some disease and say I have to resign." pic.twitter.com/SLcvrwaPCA
— Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) December 4, 2020
Editor: You likely know all of this news already. I started this post yesterday, but my internet went down again.
Surely you have heard this news from Monday reported here at Politico (Leftwingers) who suggest that Barr is not serious, but only making this move to appease the President and us.
By the way, it is often much more useful to read the other side’s media than ours sometimes.
Whatever the motive, his move forced the director of the DOJ Criminal Division’s Election Crimes Branch to resign his post. However, you should read this as good news! I urge you to do a little search on one Richard Pilger who has headed that branch of the DOJ since 2010.
His name will be familiar to anyone who watched the Obama administration’s attack on Tea Party and other Conservative groups attempts to get an IRS determination to be allowed to raise money for their small emerging political action groups.
See one of many stories about him here at Judicial Watch in 2015.
Here is Politico:
Attorney General William Barr appeared Monday to make a bid to reassure backers of President Donald Trump who have complained bitterly in recent days that the Justice Department was not taking action to combat alleged voter fraud and other election irregularities.
In a memo to U.S. attorneys, Barr authorized them to open election-fraud investigations “if there are clear and apparently-credible allegations of irregularities that, if true, could potentially impact the outcome of a federal election in an individual State.”
Barr’s memo broadening the authorities of prosecutors in the election season had an abrupt and dramatic impact: prompting the veteran career official running the Justice Department branch that oversees such prosecutions to step down from his post, effective immediately.
[….]
Shortly after Barr’s directive was released, Richard Pilger, director of the DOJ Criminal Division’s Election Crimes Branch, sent colleagues an email saying he was transferring to another role in the department. The 28-year-veteran federal prosecutor also made unmistakably clear that alarm at Barr’s policy shift prompted his exit from the job he has held since 2010.
Sorry to make you sick this morning but they will all be back if Biden/Harris get away with stealing the election!
Angling for something are we?
It’s a historic day for Black women, South Asian women, women of color, women everywhere, for America. pic.twitter.com/7aDTSkLHRE
— Vanita Gupta (@vanitaguptaCR) August 11, 2020
Vanita Gupta, who served as head of Justice’s Civil Rights Division under President Barack Obama, posted a copy of Pilger’s resignation email online and called it “a testament to how grossly politicized and partisan the Barr DOJ is, in service of Trump.”
Still, the wording of Barr’s memo left unclear whether it was largely a sop to the president’s supporters or whether it portends serious investigations into last week’s election, of which Joe Biden was declared the winner over Trump.
[….]
Gupta suggested the memo was little more than posturing intended to satisfy the president and fuel misperceptions that voting fraud on any serious scale affected the 2020 presidential contest.
“Let’s be clear — this is about disruption, disinformation, and sowing chaos,” Gupta, now president of the Leadership Conference on Civil & Human Rights. “Trump is furious, demanding all ‘his’ lawyers take action. They have no evidence, so they’ll push the PR.”
“Voters decided election & overwhelmingly picked Biden,” added Gupta. “Election was secure & fair. No factual basis for memo. Scaremongering about opening investigations doesn’t change result.”
If I have the energy to continue blogging, it would be fun to feature the Biden/Harris players as they scurry back into government hidey-holes (if they succeed in stealing the election, that is.)
Yikes! How is the ‘cancel culture’ going to process this news?
It seems that Beck hired a genealogical firm to follow ol’ Joe’s family tree to the generations that preceded the Civil War and came up with this gem.
When I searched around I see that allegations of a slave-owning past have been leveled against the family before, but have been quickly dismissed by the likes of Snopes. Beck apparently figured ‘where there was smoke there was fire‘ and hired investigators to get the goods.
Below is Beck in a Youtube video yesterday, but you can also go here to see the video in case Youtube yanks it. Beck predicts that the mainstreamers will bury this uncomfortable fact unless you help spread the news.
Of course we understand that no one can be held responsible for every family member for generations, but since the Progressive Left wants to cancel Thomas Jefferson that would make Joe Robinette Biden fair game, right!
You can go here for links to the census documents Beck’s team has unearthed.
The Left will not have to address these allegations because Beck predicts the story will not reach their ears.
If accurate, that would make both the top and bottom of the Democrat ticket descendants of slave owners. Harris’ Jamaican family tree included a more prosperous slave owner than Biden’s however.
By the way, George Washington freed his slaves in his will, their full emancipation came on January 1, 1801. Beck’s records show that Joe’s ancestors held on right up to the Civil War—more than a half century later.
Neither Donald Trump or Mike Pence have a drop of slave-owner blood.
Why do Democrat women have to look so smug and sound so snarky?
I watched some of the debate last night between the calm and unflappable Vice President Mike Pence and Joe Biden’s running mate Senator Kamala Harris, but couldn’t bare it at about 30 minutes in, concluding that….
….I do not want to look at that smug face for 4 years!
It is the same gut reaction I had to Hillary’s face.
Clearly ‘the face’ got lots of reactions as The Hill reported in a story about it.
But, believe it or not, the Lefties loved it, saying her facial expressions were the best part of the debate for many. (I guess they didn’t have much else to be happy about.)
From Mashable:
They loved this look!
You know who else likely loved the giggly girl look—Putin and Xi Jinping.
The reaction on the Left to Kamala’s face makes it clear. There is never going to be a coming together, a reach across the aisle moment for America ever!
So, as Rush has said for years, they must be defeated.
Has this happened to you? Somehow the Democrats have acquired my e-mail address so that many times a day I am treated to junk like this below.
I wonder where I shopped or where I visited that resulted in my now being on their lists.
In some ways it is okay because it has been kind of an eye-opener to see just what they are telling their fellow Lefties as they desperately look for more voters (and more MONEY!).
I will mark them as spam eventually, but in the meantime I’m getting a clearer view of how nasty these Democrat women are.
Getting desperate? I guess they have nothing other than name-calling—“anti-woman bigot Mike Pence.”
Fake polls….
LOL! I guess I will now have to vote NO, I don’t approve of Kamala Harris, and see what happens!