Two Images of Fox News Yesterday: The Good/bad/ugly

First the bad and ugly. Twitter was alive with this short off-mic moment featuring Sandra Smith making faces at comments by long time conservative super lawyer Cleta Mitchell.

Apparently someone inside Fox leaked it after a Saturday airing of ‘America’s Newsroom’ with Smith and Trace Gallagher.  Smith’s off-camera face is revealing.

Over 2,000 comments are a fun read.

One commenter said: “We the 70 + million deplorables built Fox, now we tear it down.”

 

 

But, there was good too as Tucker Carlson did not fail us.  If you missed his opening monologue last night here it is:

 

Will be watching to see who goes and who stays at Fox News…..

Glenn Beck: Joe Biden’s Ancestors Were Maryland Slave Owners!

Yikes!  How is the ‘cancel culture’ going to process this news?

It seems that Beck hired a genealogical firm to follow ol’ Joe’s family tree to the generations that preceded the Civil War and came up with this gem.

When I searched around I see that allegations of a slave-owning past have been leveled against the family before, but have been quickly dismissed by the likes of Snopes. Beck apparently figured ‘where there was smoke there was fire‘ and hired investigators to get the goods.

Below is Beck in a Youtube video yesterday, but you can also go here to see the video in case Youtube yanks it.  Beck predicts that the mainstreamers will bury this uncomfortable fact unless you help spread the news.

Of course we understand that no one can be held responsible for every family member for generations, but since the Progressive Left wants to cancel Thomas Jefferson that would make Joe Robinette Biden fair game, right!

 

 

You can go here for links to the census documents Beck’s team has unearthed.

The Left will not have to address these allegations because Beck predicts the story will not reach their ears.

If accurate, that would make both the top and bottom of the Democrat ticket descendants of slave owners.  Harris’  Jamaican family tree included a more prosperous slave owner than Biden’s however.

By the way, George Washington freed his slaves in his will, their full emancipation came on January 1, 1801.  Beck’s records show that Joe’s ancestors held on right up to the Civil War—more than a half century later.

Neither Donald Trump or Mike Pence have a drop of slave-owner blood.

Interfaith Alliance Opposes Judge Amy Coney Barrett’s Nomination to Sit on the High Court

She is the first appointment this group of Religious Leftists has ever opposed. She is that much of a threat to them!

Decades ago the cultural Marxists knew that in order to bring communism to America they had to break down the nuclear family and worm their way into the churches and other religious institutions.  Having done that, they are now very much seeing their labor bear fruit as they are closer than they have ever been to overthrowing our government to help bring about the worldwide ‘Great Reset.

Donald Trump and Amy Coney Barrett stand in their way.

The twenty-five-year old ‘Interfaith Alliance’ has for the first time, they say, come out in opposition to a judicial nomination to the high court (Amy Coney Barrett is that much of a threat to the Marxists!).

Here is what they said in a press release late last week under a huge banner that reads RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IS UNDER THREAT:

 

For First Time in its History, Interfaith Alliance Opposes Nominee to the Federal Bench

Concludes that Judge Amy Coney Barrett’s confirmation would irreparably endanger religious freedom in the U.S. for those of all faiths and none

WASHINGTON — Interfaith Alliance will oppose the confirmation of Judge Amy Coney Barrett as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court given the danger her stated views pose to the religious freedoms of all Americans. Her faith played no part in this decision, but rather her long record of statements and decisions that run counter to the historic understanding of religious freedom in this country.

This marks the first time in the organization’s more than 25 year history it has opposed a judicial or executive nomination on the merits of the nominee.

Following Justice Ginsburg’s death, Interfaith Alliance urged the president and Senate Leader Mitch McConnell to honor the precedent they set in 2016 and allow the winner of November’s election to nominate her successor. The organization also released five essential questions related to religious freedom that we believe any incoming nominee must answer. Once these calls went unheeded, the organization voiced our initial concerns around Judge Coney Barrett’s nomination.

Rabbi Jack Moline

Said Rabbi Jack Moline, president of Interfaith Alliance: Believing that honesty and thoroughness are essential in any confirmation process, in the days following her nomination, we examined Judge Coney Barrett’s public statements, activities, and record as a federal judge with an eye toward the future of religious freedom.

Our thorough review of Judge Coney Barrett’s record reveals an interpretation of religious freedom that threatens our basic right to believe as we choose. Interfaith Alliance therefore takes the unprecedented step of opposing her nomination to the Supreme Court.

This is not a decision we reach lightly, but it is one we make with resolve and determination. We do so not to call into question Judge Coney Barrett’s personal beliefs or experience, but out of profound concern for her commitment to protecting true religious freedom for all Americans. Her judicial philosophy, evidenced by her past work, endangers the decades of progress our nation has made toward the abiding promise that every American is equal under the law.

You can read Interfaith Alliance’s full response to Judge Coney Barrett’s nomination here. If you are interested in speaking further with Rabbi Moline, please contact Manisha Sunil at msunil@westendstrategy.com and (202) 417-0171.

So who are the seventy five faith groups the Interfaith Alliance says they represent?

Is your “faith group” speaking for you?

 

Those in orange are hot-linked in the original so please go to the site and have a look at who exactly they are. Note that the gang is all here:  Roman Catholics, Muslims, Baptists, Wiccans! More!

Be on the lookout for local Interfaith Groups working in your towns and cities. They are politically active Leftists with a fake religious veneer.

Revolver News Makes News as it Seeks to Replace Drudge Report

If you haven’t already given up on Drudge, it is way past time.  A quick scan of the Drudge Report‘s headlines will make it clear that Matt Drudge has joined the never Trumpers.

“ATTENTION NEWS JUNKIES: We are the new Drudge!”

This week Revolver News, claiming to replace the increasingly liberal anti-Trump Drudge, is promoting an exposé on the Presidential Debate Commission by calling out its members’ bias. Hint! John McCain reaches back from the grave.

That story is here.

[They do have some competition from WhatfingerNews which was also created to replace Drudge!]

We featured Revolver News writer Darren Beattie here when we showed you a clip of his interview on Tucker Carlson about the “color revolution” (a coup) being deployed against the President.

Too funny!  Newsguard (the “Internet Trust Tool” Ha! Ha!) which is one more mechanism for big tech and the elite to censor the news you see has, not surprisingly, given Revolver a failing score in an effort to silence the news aggregation site.  Their explanation reads like a reason for you to follow the site!

Here is a screenshot of some stories Revolver is linking this morning.

 

I am sure you have noticed that in the two debates so far there has been no mention of the Second Amendment and the right to bear arms, or immigration, both issues where the President has shown strong leadership.

Newsguard and the Leftwing controlled media are attempting to censor what you see and read.  Don’t let them.

Read at Revolver News, and at Whatfinger as well, as you ween yourself from a good portion of Fox News.   (If God forbid, Trump loses, I hope he creates a media outlet to compete with Fox!)

Here is a list of ‘more-or-less’ conservative news sites you might already be following.

Kamala’s Facial Contortions Were Too Much to Bear

So much for gravitas! Poster girl for why so few women have made it to the top of the heap in politics?

Why do Democrat women have to look so smug and sound so snarky? 

I watched some of the debate last night between the calm and unflappable Vice President Mike Pence and Joe Biden’s running mate Senator Kamala Harris, but couldn’t bare it at about 30 minutes in, concluding that….

….I do not want to look at that smug face for 4 years!

It is the same gut reaction I had to Hillary’s face.

Clearly ‘the face’ got lots of reactions as The Hill reported in a story about it.

Kamala Harris’s facial expressions during debate go viral

But, believe it or not, the Lefties loved it, saying her facial expressions were the best part of the debate for many. (I guess they didn’t have much else to be happy about.)

From Mashable:

Kamala Harris’ reactions to Mike Pence at the VP debate are all you need to see

They  loved this look!

You know who else likely loved the giggly girl look—Putin and Xi Jinping.

The reaction on the Left to Kamala’s face makes it clear. There is never going to be a coming together, a reach across the aisle moment for America ever!

So, as Rush has said for years, they must be defeated.