Find Out! Are Your Neighbors Mostly Republicans, Democrats or Independents?

This is a follow-up to my recent post in which I discussed whether you should consider moving in order to live in a community whose members share your values and ideals.

Where in America Should I Live? For Sure, Not Minnesota!

Well, to help you make that decision, The New York Times published this week news about a site where you can type in your address, or the address of a home you might be considering, and find out just who your neighbors are—politically that is!

America is increasingly politically polarized. How politically diverse do you think your neighborhood is? Do you think your neighbors are mostly Democrats or Republicans? Do you think you live in a partisan bubble?

In “Do You Live in a Political Bubble?,” Gus Wezerek, Ryan D. Enos and Jacob Brown designed an interactive tool to help you find out. Enter your address to see the political party of the thousand voters closest to you and see if the data matches your answers above.

Click that link above ‘Do You Live in a Political Bubble?, type your address into the search bar, wait a few seconds and if you live near me, this is what you will get….  Cool!

 

However, all Republicans are not equal.  Tomorrow I’ll post on the 100 RINO elitists who plan to break away from the Republican Party if the party continues to support Donald Trump, the “radical” who supports us—the deplorables.

Besides the people, consider this when buying rural property….

When people mention to me that they are looking for country property there is another major consideration.  You must find out if the federal government adjoins your prospective property.

I found that out the hard way in the late 1980s, but it’s been quiet lately. For a number of recent years the greedy feds have not been out in a big way seeking to expand control or outright ownership of land for parks and forests etc.  Unfortunately that monster is likely already rising as the extreme Left expands its power.

It is all part of their communist dream world!

Do not buy rural property that shares a property line with any federal, or state-owned land, for that matter.

Kamala’s Facial Contortions Were Too Much to Bear

So much for gravitas! Poster girl for why so few women have made it to the top of the heap in politics?

Why do Democrat women have to look so smug and sound so snarky? 

I watched some of the debate last night between the calm and unflappable Vice President Mike Pence and Joe Biden’s running mate Senator Kamala Harris, but couldn’t bare it at about 30 minutes in, concluding that….

….I do not want to look at that smug face for 4 years!

It is the same gut reaction I had to Hillary’s face.

Clearly ‘the face’ got lots of reactions as The Hill reported in a story about it.

Kamala Harris’s facial expressions during debate go viral

But, believe it or not, the Lefties loved it, saying her facial expressions were the best part of the debate for many. (I guess they didn’t have much else to be happy about.)

From Mashable:

Kamala Harris’ reactions to Mike Pence at the VP debate are all you need to see

They  loved this look!

You know who else likely loved the giggly girl look—Putin and Xi Jinping.

The reaction on the Left to Kamala’s face makes it clear. There is never going to be a coming together, a reach across the aisle moment for America ever!

So, as Rush has said for years, they must be defeated.

 

Mass Migration is Changing America,White Population Declining

I’ve joked over the years and said if the majority of ‘new Americans’ voted for Republicans, Democrats would be standing at the borders with pitchforks forcing them to go home!

Democrats support for mass migration is changing America by changing the people and there is no ambiguity about it.

John Binder at Breitbart tells us about a new Pew analysis of the changing electorate:

Pew Research: Mass Immigration Drives Up Democrat Support in Swing States

Mass immigration to the United States is likely driving up support in key swing states as foreign-born voters and the U.S.-born children of immigrants increasingly account for the electorate, a Pew Research Center analysis reveals.

The analysis reviews the rapid demographic shifts of the American electorate compared to nearly 20 years ago. From 2000 to 2018, the share of non-Hispanic white eligible voters has steadily declined from 76 percent to 67 percent.

[….]

The Pew researchers say the nation’s annual admission of about 1.2 million foreign nationals is the reason for the demographic shift, an advantage for Democrats:

Pew Research Center survey data spanning more than two decades shows that the Democratic Party maintains a wide and long-standing advantage among Black, Hispanic and Asian American registered voters. Among White voters, the partisan balance has been generally stable over the past decade, with the Republican Party holding a slight advantage.

[….]

The Washington PostNew York Times, the AtlanticAxios, the Los Angeles Times, and the Wall Street Journal have all admitted that rapid demographic changes because of immigration are tilting the nation toward a permanent Democrat dominance.

“The single biggest threat to Republicans’ long-term viability is demographics,” Axios acknowledged last year. “The numbers simply do not lie … there’s not a single demographic megatrend that favors Republicans.”  [maybe no megatrend, but there are some small hopeful trends.—ed]

 

The implication of all of this is that whites will eventually be completely out voted.

But who says all whites are good/decent/patriotic people?

If whites are producing privileged punks like these angry Antifa types, what good does that do America?

 

When you look at images coming from riot torn cities, large numbers of the Antifa and BLM thugs are white.  At the same time there appears to be a shift developing as some blacks, like Candace Owens, and Hispanics are moving to Donald Trump’s Republican Party because they are patriots who love America.

The big question is, will that small but growing shift happen fast enough to save the party, or the country for that matter?

If Trump gets four more years it might.  If he doesn’t, we are done.

Dems Find My E-mail Address and Send Me Junk Like This All Day

Has this happened to you?  Somehow the Democrats have acquired my e-mail address so that many times a day I am treated to junk like this below.

I wonder where I shopped or where I visited that resulted in my now being on their lists.

In some ways it is okay because it has been kind of an eye-opener to see just what they are telling their fellow Lefties as they desperately look for more voters (and more MONEY!).

I will mark them as spam eventually, but in the meantime I’m getting a clearer view of how nasty these Democrat women are.

Getting desperate? I guess they have nothing other than name-calling—“anti-woman bigot Mike Pence.”

Fake polls….

LOL! I guess I will now have to vote NO, I don’t approve of Kamala Harris, and see what happens!

Dems Continue Lies About So-Called Muslim Ban

As I have reported innumerable times recently at RRW, thousands of Muslims continue to enter the US from all over the world.  There is no Muslim ban.

But, the Democrats are never hindered by the facts as John Binder points out about last nights Democrat infomerical (aka 2020 presidential convention).

By the way, I’m busy these days prepping and generally getting stuff in order (if you know what I mean), and so I only plan to post when I see something that I find interesting.  Consider this my August recess.

From Breitbart:

Fact Check: The Travel Ban Is Neither a ‘Muslim Ban,’ Nor Unconstitutional

CLAIM: President Donald Trump’s travel ban was a “Muslim ban” and was unconstitutional.

VERDICT: False. The travel ban was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Yates with creepy Clapper in 2017.

Actress Tracee Ellis Ross, who moderated the second evening of the Democrat National Convention (DNC), claimed that President Trump’s travel ban was unconstitutional She introduced former Acting U.S. Attorney General Sally Yates, whom she said “refused to defend an unconstitutional travel ban and paid for it with her job.”

Yates herself then described it as a “shameful and unlawful Muslim travel ban.”

In reality, the Supreme Court ruled in a 5-4 decision in Trump v. Hawaii that the president has extraordinarily broad discretion under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(f) to exclude aliens when he believes doing so is in the nation’s interests.

[….]

In Senate testimony in May 2017, Yates admitted that she had been motivated partly by “policy” considerations, which were not hers to make, and that she based her view of the ban not on the executive order but Trump’s previous statements. She even admitted that she had overruled the Office of Legal Counsel, which had confirmed the order’s constitutionality.

Yates was simply wrong about the Constitution and the law. She was a political actor seeking to create controversy; she could have resigned in protest, but instead forced the administration to fire her to create a sense of being victimized.

More here.