Before I send you to the interview at Youtube, know that I was pleased to see that Beck gave Simpson credit for all of Simpson’s researchon the Cloward and Piven strategy more than a decade ago.
I wrote about the strategy as well. Here is one post:
The reason I am mentioning Cloward and Piven in a post about Karl Marx is that in case you are scratching your heads and wondering why the Biden cabal doesn’t see that we can’t handle an invasion of impoverished migrants and that it seems insane to be doing what they are doing, know that it is a strategy, they do mean to bring America down so that Communism can creep in and flourish.
It won’t flourish if Americans are generally optimistic and upwardly mobile.
They need masses of poverty for their strategy to succeed.
Sorry, didn’t mean to get into a big yak… Here is Simpson’s excellent interview. Hear what a crook ol’ Karl was….
One more thing! Know that in addition to flooding America with poor people the Marxists knew they had to bring down the family and the church if they were to succeed in their evil plan. You might want to learn more about “cultural Marxism” because it explains a lot of what we are seeing.
In case you missed it, and you might have because corporate media and even some Republicans have been working hard to silence the indomitable Michelle Malkin, here is her analysis of the sudden Haitian invasion of our wide open southern border.
In nearly 30 years of covering America’s corrupted immigration and entrance policies, I can tell you definitively that every “border crisis” is a manufactured crisis.
Caravans of Latin American illegal immigrants don’t just form out of nowhere. Throngs of Middle Eastern refugees don’t just amass spontaneously. Boatloads of Haitians don’t just wash up on our shores by random circumstance.
All the world’s a stage, and as I exposed in my most recent book, “Open Borders, Inc.,” the world’s migrants are nothing more than expedient tools to globalist elites, profit-maximizing corporations, self-aggrandizing religious and nonprofit groups, and criminal smuggling syndicates.
That’s how the so-called border crises under former Presidents Bill Clinton, George Bush, Barack Obama and Donald Trump all played out.
The players are always the same: United Nations operatives, U.S. Chamber of Commerce lobbyists, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops and its sovereignty-undermining shelter operators around the world, Jewish and evangelical Christian refugee resettlement contractors, international drug cartels, human traffickers, and their militant multicultural abettors.
It’s the same old, same old under President Joe Biden.
Editor: Apologies from me for not being able to keep up with everyone’s requests for information. I am overloaded on all fronts as I try to maintain some balance in my life. Some of you have noticed that I have deactivated my Facebook page—yes, I have.
My e-mail boxes are full and overflowing! The very best way to reach me is to send a comment to this post if there is something you want me to see. I do review and moderate comments every day or so, and if you have sent me some information that is off topic, I won’t post it, but will see it.
Oh boy, where do I begin with this former Socialist President of Portugal and former UN High Commissioner for Refugees who is now the United Nation’s top dog.
Antonio Guterres was the High Commissioner for Refugees for a decade before securing his top dog seat at the UN in 2017.
His term as UNHCR encompassed many of my early years of writing Refugee Resettlement Watch so he came to my attention often.
I heard him speak and take questions in Washington in 2015and saw what I had already guessed. He was a rumpled, pudgy, bureaucrat completely lacking in charisma while spouting socialist dogma to an audience of mostly gullible young people and others in the refugee industry.
He assured those in attendance that Islamic terrorists do not use the refugee pipeline to get into western countries.
One of his many defenses of Islam as a religion of peace was in 2009 as I wrote here. He claimed that the imperative to welcome and protect the stranger came from roots in Islamic Sharia Law NOT from Judaism and Christianity.
So it should be no surprise that in the wake of Biden’s Afghanistan surrender and the Taliban’s power grab, he naively suggests that we should all be able to get along.
Why Can’t We All Get Along? U.N. Chief Guterres Wants Taliban ‘Dialogue’ with ‘Feeling’
U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres pleaded for the world to unite as one Thursday and engage the Taliban in dialogue that included a “feeling” of solidarity with the Afghan people now ruled by the hardline Islamic terrorist group.
The call for talks and more talks came 24-hours after the globalist said the Taliban needs U.N. humanitarian aid as an “entry point” for future negotiations. [Play nice and we will give you money—ed]
In an interview with Agence France-Presse (AFP), the veteran Portuguese socialist maintained compassion and caring were the keys to ensuring female rights were respected as they chart a future in the new Islamic Caliphate of Afghanistan.
If they are considered, then “peace and stability, with the rights of the people respected” can guarantee a future for the war-torn country which suffered under the Taliban’s brutal first stretch of rule from 1996 to 2001, Guterres affirmed.
“We must maintain a dialogue with the Taliban, where we affirm our principles directly — a dialogue with a feeling of solidarity with the Afghan people,” he said.
“Our duty is to extend our solidarity to a people who suffer greatly, where millions and millions risk dying of hunger,” added the secretary-general.
Calling for an end to inequality is nothing new to Guterres on the public stage, where has has previously demanded a more equal distribution of public power to benefit women.
[….]
“Until now, in the discussions that we have had, there is at least a receptivity to talk,” he added in the AFP interview.
U.N. Staff in Afghanistan ‘Fear for Their Lives’ After Taliban Takeover
United Nations (U.N.) staff members in Afghanistan are facing increased incidents of “harassment and intimidation” by members of the Taliban since the terror group seized power of the country last month, U.N. special envoy to Afghanistan Deborah Lyons said Thursday, adding that some U.N. personnel “fear for their lives.”
“We are … increasingly worried by the growing number of incidents of harassment and intimidation against our national staff,” Lyons told the U.N. Security Council during a press briefing in New York City on September 9.
First, I assume you are all following the news coming out of Arizona about the thorough audit of the disastrous November election. The best coverage I see is daily (sometimes several times a day) at Gateway Pundit.
Fox News’ behavior on election night and in the days and weeks following the debacle caused me to ditch them in favor of Newsmax and other news sources (I can’t get OANN where I live unfortunately). And, before I hear from readers, I get most of my news from reading a wide variety of online news outlets.
I have probably watched my once favorite media personality, Tucker Carlson, maybe twice since November. The second time was the night before last when I just happened to see Carlson’s segment on information coming out of Georgia about the likelihood of fraud there and I fumed—so where have you been Tucker? (I’ll put that segment at the end of this post if you missed it.).
And, then it occurred to me that perhaps sending Tucker out to report on the likelihood that there was massive fraud (in at least Georgia) allows Fox to try to save itself if a bomb drops and the Arizona certification in favor of Biden turns out to be a big lie with Fox clearly having helped Biden secure victory.
Here is the news from Newsmax that prompted me to think that Fox bigwigs are beginning to cover their asses.
Author Michael Wolfe seems to be a real creep and I have no intention of buying his book, but this sounds plausible to me….
Author: Fox News Gleefully Brought Down Trump
Fox News took glee in shockingly calling Arizona for Joe Biden before any major network, putting an end to Donald Trump’s reelection chances, author Michael Wolff claims in his new book “Landslide.”
Once the favorite news outlet of conservative Americans, Fox turned its back on its right-leaning audience last November when it decided to call Arizona shortly after polls closed — with all other networks, including Newsmax, standing down because the race was “too close to call.”
Trump’s advisers say Fox’s Arizona decision was done to create a sense of inevitability of Joe Biden’s win, limiting Trump’s ability to justifiably contest other close states like Pennsylvania.
In his book, Wolff says Rupert Murdoch, the chairman of Fox News, personally made the Arizona decision and set off a behind-the-scenes firestorm.
According to Wolff, Murdoch’s son Lachlan, the CEO of Fox Corp., was informed of the Arizona bombshell and telephoned his father to ask if Fox should report that Trump had lost the Grand Canyon State.
Next, Wolff reports in his book, Fox News anchor Bill Hemmer called top Trump strategist Jason Miller to inform him the network was kicking Trump to the curb and going ahead with the Arizona call.
Miller rose from his seat, shouting “What the f***?” Wolff writes.
But despite pressure from the Trump administration to retract the Arizona call, Fox refused.
Fox News has called Wolff’s claims of Murdoch’s involvement “wildly inaccurate” and “completely false.”
Wolff also asserts that Murdoch hated Trump, despite Fox’s support of him.
“Trump just made his skin crawl. But then, partly because of Fox News, Trump became the president of the United States, and Murdoch was forced to essentially suck up to him,” Wolff told Der Spiegel. “That was incredibly painful to Murdoch.”
James Murdoch has told members of the press that he and his Democrat siblings will someday control Fox News and plan on re-making it into establishment media.
I am done with Fox News.
Of course watch whatever you wish, but consider whether you want to enrich the Murdoch’s any further.
Here is Gateway Punditpraising Tucker for at least touching on the subject of the massive election fraud everyone with a brain knows took place.
Sorry if I am a cynic on the subject of Tucker, but I think he is their tool to begin to get ready for what I think will ultimately happen—that they will have to admit that they were wrong when they called Arizona for dementia Joe.
By sending Carlson out now on the subject, they will be able to say to faithful viewers that they did in fact report on the massive 2020 election fraud (more than six months too late!).
They aren’t blasting the Chinese Communist Party which is too bad, but are going after Hilton Hotels that supposedly plans (or is already building!) a hotel where a Uyghur Mosque once stood.
I am fine with CAIR going after the globalists if it means for even a few minutes they aren’t spitting on us. I would, however, be happier if they called the Chinese Communist Party out directly.
Before I get to this news, I am going off-topic (sort of!). I’m reading ‘2034’ and it is scary stuff.
In the meantime, my friend Leo Hohmann is posting about an invasion by China and a possible war with Russia, a war which our military seems increasingly unprepared for.
I have mixed feelings about even talking and writing this way. Is it irresponsible to scare the you-know-what out of us, or is it simply a good idea to ponder what is possible and prepare oneself mentally, if as the serious preppers say—the Shit Hits the Fan? You tell me!
Because I have China on my mind, here is the news about CAIR going after Hilton Hotels. From the New York Post:
China inks deal with Hilton to build hotel over bulldozed Uyghur mosque: report
Hilton Hotels has allegedly inked a deal with Chinese Communist authorities to build a new property at the site of a Uyghur mosque bulldozed by the government — and the hotel chain is refusing to comment on reports of the plan.
Multiple emails and phone calls made to the hotel chain by The Post were not returned regarding the plans, first reported by the Telegraph earlier this month.
Bitter Winter, an online magazine about religious issues in China, reported Wednesday that the land where the Duling Mosque used to stand in Hotan, part of Xinjiang province, was sold at public auction to a local developer.
That developer, the magazine reported, then signed a contract to develop a Hampton by Hilton Hotel.
The mosque was demolished in 2018, according to satellite images from the Australian Strategic Policy Institute, the group behind the Xinjiang Data Project.
And construction on the Hilton project, the Telegraph reported, is already underway.
Propaganda on the construction site’s walls urges those passing by the structure to “warmly celebrate the Communist Party’s 100th anniversary,” the UK outlet reported.
[….]
The Council on American-Islamic Relations, a top Muslim advocacy group, wrote to Hilton CEO Chris Nassetta earlier this month to protest the deal.
It is not clear what kind of response they received from the hotel CEO. A spokesman for the group did not immediately respond to The Post’s request for comment.
Edward Ahmed Mitchell
“Hilton has a unique opportunity to take a clear stance against China’s structural human rights abuses and Islamophobia and to set an example for other prominent corporations,” wrote CAIR’s national deputy director, Edward Ahmed Mitchell.
By ignoring the genocide and continuing to do business in Xinjiang, he wrote, “American [globalist!–ed} corporations would be sending a clear message that it does not support international human rights.”
In case you missed it, and you might have because corporate media and even some Republicans have been working hard to silence the indomitable Michelle Malkin, here is her analysis of the sudden Haitian invasion of our wide open southern border.
