I know, I know, it isn’t kosher to speak ill of the dead, but really, can we now stop gushing over Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg?
I began paying a little attention to her while writing many posts at Refugee Resettlement Watchabout the hellhole that South Africa has become since Nelson Mandela and his ilk took over the country and turned it into a supposed Nirvana, claiming it is now the “rainbow nation” where love and peace reign and fairness for all is written in their constitution.
(If you haven’t seen my archive on the “rainbow nation” click here.)
Have alook at that constitution (it says everyone has a right to everything!) and you will see why Africans from across that continent flooded there only to experience xenophobia on a level greater than any country in the world.
Ginsburg reportedly praised that commie constitution over the US Constitution, although her fan base claimed her comments were taken out of context. See Foreign Policy for one version of the 2012 controversy.
One writer who isn’t sending air kisses to Ginsburg is Frank Miele opining at Heartland Diary(hat tip: Paul):
RBG has a remarkable legacy — but so do Lenin and Mao. Please stop praising her if you are a conservative!
Democrats are accusing Republicans of being hypocritical, and they are, but not because they want to vote to replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg during an election year.
The real reason they are hypocritical is because they don’t have the cojones to call Ginsburg what she was — a hard-left Democrat extremist who was only interested in using her position on the Supreme Court to fundamentally transform the United States into a politically correct, disarmed socialist republic. Her support for a woman’s right to choose to kill her unborn child is partly responsible for the deaths of millions of babies.
How do Republican senators square that with their effusive praise of her? Simple. As I already said — hypocrisy. Can you imagine Democrats praising Donald Trump as the most significant president of the last 75 years (or more) when he dies? Hell no, because the Democrats know he was their sworn enemy. Republicans are too cowardly to tell the truth about Ginsburg.
A random sampling of the Republican praise for Ginsburg should prove the point:
Thank God we have Trump in the White House! Almost every other Republican you can think of (if he/she was President at this auspicious moment in history) would be tucking tail and running and attempting to show that they are good people by not pushing forward with a nominee for Ha! Ha! “Ginsburg’s seat!”
And, this could be happening where you live as well!
See yesterday’s commentary by Catherine Trauernicht at the Bull Elephant:
What you can do NOW to promote Election Integrity
There is something you can do right now to promote election integrity in the Commonwealth of Virginia. Democrats in the General Assembly are colluding with Governor Ralph Northam to undermine the sanctity of your vote. You must act NOW!
Here is what you can do:
Contact the State Board of Elections and say NO to a proposed regulation that would:
Permit absentee ballots to be delivered to the Office of Elections by Noon on Friday after Election Day with no proof that they had been submitted on or before Election Day.
Background: Prior to this year’s General Assembly (GA) action,absentee ballots had to be returned to the Office of Elections or local polling stations by 7PM on Election Day when the polls closed. If they missed the deadline, they were not counted.
This year, the GA amended the election law statute and Gov. Northam signed the bill into law, permitting absentee ballots to be postmarked by Election Day and received by the Office of Elections by Noon on Friday following Election Day.
Subsequently, the Virginia State Board of Elections proposed a regulation stating that an absentee ballot could be returned by Noon on Friday after Election Day with NO postmark or other proof that it had been submitted by 7PM on Election Day. [Note: the Board of Elections cannot alter election law by regulatory action, but they’re trying.]
Continue reading to see the trick that the Board of Elections is trying to pull off that effectively extends the deadline.
There is a proposed regulation. Comments end October 2nd and all Virginia patriots need to get to work!
We all better be checking our own states for Board of Elections’ strategies to dilute our votes!
Changing the subject!
I am reminded again how lucky Virginia conservatives are to have a publication like the Bull Elephant. I wish all states had media outlets providing news for our people.
Be a citizen journalist!
There is a lot of talk on social media these days about how Big Tech is silencing the most visible voices on the Right and that this trend will be accelerated at the time of the election and the days and weeks following the election as the Left plans to create chaos, confusion and anger when Trump likely pulls off a victory.
And, that brings me to a point I have been making for ten years. Everyone of you reading this should consider setting up your own local blog (ultimately to replace your local leftwing paper) because they won’t be able to shut everyone up.
As they thwart news coming out of big blogs, your voice might still reach your circle of followers (even if its ten people in your neighborhood).
Also, If you are already on Twitter and Facebook, lay low and don’t get tossed from the platform in the next few weeks. It might be fun to report that you have been targeted, but it won’t be helpful when communication becomes vital to our survival.
We're being set up for a civil war. The Left is grooming us for an Eastern European-style revolution this election, and they’re not even trying to hide it any more. The playbook for Mainstreet USA is the exact same that has been used in places like Ukraine, initiated by the same people in order to completely upend the American system. Tonight, I break out the chalkboards to connect the dots: the Obama administration in Ukraine, the State Department's relationship with George Soros, Black Lives Matter and Antifa riots, the Great Reset, public school indoctrination, mail-in voting. It all points to something dangerous happening in November if we don't act now. Watch the full show on BlazeTV's YouTube page at 9:30 ET
Posted by Glenn Beck on Wednesday, September 16, 2020
The Somali woman who has risked her life to tell us about what Islamists want was on Tucker Carlson last night to explain that the Leftists in our streets today and the Islamists are similar in their goals because both “want to destroy America.” Why? Because they hate what America stands for.
Take a few minutes to see what she told Tucker:
I didn’t actually see Bill White’s piece as the first thing I read this morning, but saw this first, 4th in a series examination (DailyRollCall) of a leading Marxist training center in TN entitled:
Why Do Highlander Center Directors Hate America? – Part 4
Read it and see how organized the Communists are (hiding out in places like rural Tennessee). They have been building for this coming day for decades.
If ol’ Joe wins big they will have no excuse for a war, but a close race, especially with Trump the victor, will provide the tinder for the big one they have been waiting for.
There have been rumblings of a new civil war for several years now, as the political divide in this country has broadened.
Many on the right consider it a bit of a joke, as there are more gun owners on the left than there are on the right. However, there are actually more gun owners on the political left than most of us realize. According to information from statistia.com, 16% of Democrats claim to be own guns. While that is considerably lower than the 45% of Republicans who own them, it’s not something that can just be ignored.
We’re all aware that Democrats have refused to accept President Trump’s victory in 2016, with those in Congress and the press working overtime to find some way to get rid of him. That’s what Mueller’s Russian investigation was about and that’s what impeaching the president was all about, their two most blatant attempts.
Democrats used every trick in the book to win the last elections, even resorting to illegal activity if the information I’ve seen is true. There was a considerable amount of violence, as paid “activists” tried to affect the election. But even with all that, Democrats didn’t succeed in changing the vote and getting what they wanted. They’re still denying that Donald Trump won the election fairly and legally.
Now, before Election Day has even gotten here, organizations tied to the Democrat Party are already talking about what they’ll do, if Joe Biden doesn’t win by a landslide. Put simply, the violence from the death of George Floyd is nothing compared to what they are planning on doing.
There are those who are billing this next civil war as a “racial war;” but that’s not true. All we need to do to see the fallacy in that statement is to look at the riots that have been happening. There have been as many whites involved in those riots, as blacks; and the whites are more likely to be the ones to start any real battles.
The riots we have seen and any further violence is nothing more than a collective temper tantrum. Rioters are making demands of people, businesses, and governments, attempting to force them to bow their knee to the rioters’ demands. Like the demonstrations which have happened on various college campuses, they think that their demanding something should be enough to force everyone to go along and give them what they want.
This is, by definition, terrorism, using violence to cause political change.
While the riots we are seeing in this country have been birthed out of the Black Lives Matter movement, they have nothing to do with saving black lives. Rather, it is a Marxist revolution, intended to bring down the current order of things and replace it with socialism/communism. We can see this from the types of things that the left is demanding, such as defunding the police, tearing down monuments, changing names to just about anything that connects us with our past, and demanding redistribution of wealth.
Quite literally, this war will be about keeping America or losing it. If it is won by the revolutionaries, it will no longer be the land of the free and home of the brave. It will be a socialist or communist country, descending into poverty.
Without any obvious uniform differences or geographic boundaries, it’s hard to tell how this war will go. Most likely it will be a war limited to urban areas, especially the larger cities. Since it will grow out of the current riots, it will probably start in the same places, mostly inner-city areas, largely inhabited by the very same people who the revolution claims they want to help.
What we’re looking at is long-term battles for the streets of our cities. Without clearly defined armies and boundaries, it will be hard to win any battle. Rather, there will just be ongoing battles every night, which could go on for years.
This is the future I see, one in which constant battles are being fought across our land. It will be urban guerrilla warfare of the worst kind.
There is much more, read it all here. White suggests that if you live in an urban setting, it might be time to get out!
If you have been wondering why some of the hardcore Leftists in the Democrat party seem to be so blasé about supporting Joe Biden (past history as a warmonger with a bad record on civil rights) as their leader, maybe it is because his electoral loss will give them their most prized opportunity—civil war. (Duh! My smart readers probably figured that out long ago!)
How are your preps going? This post is filed in my ‘Rioting Leftists’tag where you will find previous posts on getting prepared.
This morning as I am about to write about the horrible decisions Sweden has made on immigration (that they now admit) by ‘welcoming’ thousands upon thousands of migrants from Africa and the Middle East and now see those migrants forming ethnic enclaves, refusing to “integrate,” and where violence and crime is exploding, we see that the country may have made the right decision by not locking down the quasi-socialist country in an attempt to stop the Chinese virus.
The Financial Times has an excellent story posted last week. It is a valuable read in its entirety. Here are just a few snips(emphasis below is mine):
Anders Tegnell and the Swedish Covid experiment | Free to read
The controversial epidemiologist believes lockdown is ‘using a hammer to kill a fly’. Could he be proved right?
At the start of this year, Anders Tegnell was just a low-profile bureaucrat in a country of 10m people, heading a department that collects and analyses data on public health. Today, he has become one of the best known — and most controversial — figures of the global coronavirus crisis.
The 64-year-old Swedish doctor was meant to spend 2020 helping Somalia set up a public health agency as well as sending questionnaires out to Swedes to gauge different aspects of their wellbeing. Instead, his approach to Covid-19 — to keep schools, restaurants, fitness centres and borders open while refusing to follow China in imposing a formal lockdown — has seen him become an unlikely polarising figure for a polarised age.
For many Swedes, their state epidemiologist has embodied a rational approach as other countries have appeared to sacrifice science to emotion.
“At the outset, we talked very much about sustainability, and I think that’s something we managed to keep to. And also be a bit resistant to quick fixes, to realise that this is not going to be easy, it is not going to be a short-term kind of thing, it’s not going to be fixed by one kind of measure. We see a disease that we’re going to have to handle for a long time into the future and we need to build up systems for doing that,” he says, with his arms crossed tightly to his chest as they are for nearly the entire hour-long interview.
Our meeting comes as things appear to be going his way. As coronavirus cases rise in pretty much all other European countries, leading to fears of a second wave including in the UK, they have been sinking all summer in Sweden. On a per capita basis, they are now 90 per cent below their peak in late June and under Norway’s and Denmark’s for the first time in five months. Tegnell had told me the first time we spoke in the spring that it would be in the autumn when it became more apparent how successful each country had been.